If you’re even remotely familiar with Old West lore, you’ve
heard the name of Wild Bill Hickok. He is one of the staples of Old West
legends, though until recently, I hadn’t heard how he became the famous
gunslinger we know today. So here’s the story.
The man known as “Wild Bill” was born James Butler Hickok on
May 27, 1837, in Homer, Illinois (now Troy Grove, Illinois). By age 18, Hickok
moved from there. Among his various jobs, he worked as a constable in
Monticello Township, Kansas, and eventually took a job with the freighting
company of Russell, Waddell, and Majors (the parent company for the Pony
Express). At the outbreak of the Civil War, he joined the Union Army and served
in various capacities including scout, police detective, and a spy who went
behind Confederate lines.
Wild Bill Hickok, circa 1860's |
It was at the end of the Civil War when Wild Bill’s “stardom”
came about. The war ended in April 1865, and by July of the same year, Wild
Bill was haunting around Springfield, Missouri, gambling in the saloons and
poker rooms there. A friend of Hickock’s from before the war, Davis Tutt, was
also in Springfield. Tutt had served with the Confederate Army, which may have
contributed to the tensions that would ultimately make Wild Bill famous.
On July 20, 1865, Hickok was playing poker in the Lyon House
hotel when Tutt confronted him about a $35 debt Tutt said Wild Bill owed him.
Hickok disagreed on the amount, stating he held a “memorandum” that showed the
debt was for $25 instead. Hickok tried to produce the paper, but Tutt grabbed
Hickok’s Waltham pocket watch from the poker table and promised to hold it as
collateral until the issue was settled. Hickok grew irate and told him not to
wear the watch, or he would be shot.
The following day, the pair argued back and forth and
eventually met to discuss the issue over a glass of whiskey. While neither
seemed anxious for a gunfight, they couldn’t reach a resolution either, so Tutt
left in frustration. At about 6 p.m., Tutt appeared on the street near the
courthouse wearing Hickok’s watch. Wild Bill stepped out from the other side of
the town square, warning Davis Tutt, “Don’t come over here wearing that watch!”
Tutt didn’t comply with the warning, and the two men came within about
seventy-five yards of each other before they drew and fired.
Drawing of the shootout from Harper's |
Two gunshots sounded so close together, the bystanders
almost couldn’t distinguish that there were multiple shots. Tutt’s bullet flew
high, missing Wild Bill all together. Hickok’s bullet struck true, lodging in
Tutt’s heart. The mortally wounded man is reported to have gasped, “Boys, I’m
killed,” just before he staggered a few steps toward the courthouse and dropped
to the ground. In all, the deadly episode lasted only seconds.
Hickok was arrested on manslaughter charges, and the
following month, he stood trial. Tutt’s friends testified that Wild Bill
approached the deceased man with his gun drawn and shot in cold blood. Hickok’s
allies testified that they’d both drawn their guns and shot at the same time.
Tutt’s pistol was introduced into evidence, and the fact that it was missing
only one bullet led the jury to find Hickok innocent within moments of being
sent to deliberate.
Just weeks after the shootout, Hickok became “front page
news” in Harper’s New Monthly
Magazine. Colonel George Ward Nichols wrote the
article which exaggerated little in the retelling of the deadly shootout.
However, in other parts of the magazine, as well as other publications, Wild
Bill was painted as the stuff of tall tales and legends. Among the many
falsehoods spread about him were the ideas that he’d killed over 100 men and
that he fought off a gang of ten bandits singlehandedly. Dime novelists quickly
found him to be great fodder for their pages.
After the trial for the Tutt shooting, Wild Bill went on to
work as a wilderness scout, a lawman, a “Wild West” show performer, and a
gambler. While he did participate in a few more shootouts in Kansas and Texas
in the years to come, Wild Bill met his less-than-glorified end while playing
poker in Deadwood, South Dakota’s No. 10 Saloon in 1876. His killer, Jack
McCall, sneaked up behind him and shot him in the back of the head. Wild Bill
Hickok never had a chance to draw his gun or defend himself.
It’s your turn. How do you see Wild Bill Hickok? Was he a
hero, a villain, or somewhere in between? Why do you feel as you do? Leave me
your thoughts with a valid email address, and I will select one person to
receive an autographed copy of either The Oregon Trail Romance Collection or
The Convenient Bride Collection.
Jennifer Uhlarik
discovered the western genre as a pre-teen, when she swiped the only “horse”
book she found on her older brother’s bookshelf. A new love was born. Across
the next ten years, she devoured Louis L’Amour westerns and fell in love with
the genre. In college at the University of Tampa, she began penning her own
story of the Old West. Armed with a B.A. in writing, she has won five writing
competitions and finaled in two other competitions. In addition to writing, she
has held jobs as a private business owner, a schoolteacher, a marketing
director, and her favorite—a full-time homemaker. Jennifer is active in
American Christian Fiction Writers and lifetime member of the Florida Writers
Association. She lives near Tampa, Florida, with her husband, teenaged son, and
four fur children.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading this post, I definitely do not think of Wild Bill Hickok as a hero. I also wouldn't make him a villain. I do find him rather petty for using a gun as punishment for the theft of his watch. - Terrill
ReplyDeletetlhcoupon (at) hotmail (dot) com
Thanks for your comment, Terrill. I found your statement about Hickok's "pettiness" to be thought-provoking. Guns were a common tool of that day, used for hunting and protection. Also, in many cases, there weren't reliable sources of law enforcement on the frontier. All this led to people having to take matters in their own hands sometimes. (The lack of law enforcement didn't seem to be the case in this instance, though, since Hickok was arrested soon after the incident with Tutt). But perhaps because of these facts, people were far more used to handling their issues on their own, using the tools of the day. Like I said, thought-provoking. :)
DeleteHm, villain? Not quite, but he wasn't exactly a hero. It sounds like he was a regular man who felt he needed to be true to his word, but his temper might have gotten the best of him. It seems that with the "performing", he may have tried to capitalize on his notoriety, but it also sounds like he tried to stay on the correct side of the law. So maybe he was just a regular guy. Interesting post.
ReplyDeletebcrug(at)myfairpoint(dot)net
Hi Connie, thanks for stopping by! In my research on Hickok, he did seem like a man who preferred to be on the right side of the law, as you say.
DeleteI think of Wild Bill as a little of both. He was not really a hearo but he was a villian either. I guess you have to look at the point of his life that you are talking about and each situtation. It was his temper that usually got to him as he tried to stay a good person but if you did something against him he would take care of it.
ReplyDeletebookaunt at outlook dot com
Hi Angela. Your reply is so true for most of us. When we can reign in that temper, we avoid trouble. Thanks for your thoughts!
DeleteJust commenting i loved the stories in the oregon trail romance. I think wild bill as most young men during that time took the wrong way as far as living goes.
ReplyDeleteHi Kim, so glad to hear you enjoyed the Oregon Trail Romance Collection. And yes, it was a wild and often lawless era in our nation's history, with lots of folks making some bad choices. Sure is interesting to read about now, though!
DeleteI guess I thought he was just a quirky guy from Annie Get Your Gun! I wasn't sure what his story was, which is why I love this website! I learn so much! daniellehullreads at gmail dot com
ReplyDeleteHi Danielle, so glad you love the posts here at Heroes, Heroines, and History. I learn so much from this blog as well. Such a wealth of knowledge among the posts presented!
DeleteI enjoyed today's post & I think he was a little of both! Knowing he joined the Union Army and served in various capacities including scout, police detective, and a spy who went behind Confederate lines makes him a good guy, but he also could get into some bad situations too. I think that lawless era would make it hard.
ReplyDeletedkstevensne AT outlook(DOT) com
Hi Deanna, I would have to agree with you. There were parts of his life that were very honorable and/or heroic in nature. Then there were those other parts that didn't fit that measure. Of course, that's probably a true assessment of every person's life, if we truly wanted to look deep enough. :)
DeleteWell done article, Jennifer! Wild Bill was flawed like all of us. His fame added to the variety of pros and cons and placed them into public view to be dissected and analyzed over the decades. A colorful character, to be sure. Blessings, Janet
ReplyDeleteThank you so much, Janet! Glad you enjoyed the post. Thanks for your comments.
DeleteDeanna Stevens, you are my winner for this month's drawing. Congrats. Please look for an email from me.
ReplyDeleteWonderful! I do enjoy reading collections & I know I'll love this one... thank you Jennifer!
ReplyDeleteMy Grandfather use to dress to look like Wild Bill, mustache & hat.. Love his old pictures :)
So I have heard some of the tall tales about him !
Don't you think that many people at given times, act in ways that may not always be consistent? A hero one day and then, circumstances cause the dark side to appear.
ReplyDeleteI grew up knowing about Wild Bill but I never knew all of these facts. Thanks for a great post.
Connie
cps1950 at gmail dot com
I would absolutely agree that most people act inconsistently, Connie. I think there's only one Person who has walked the earth who can fully and perfectly fit the bill of "Hero," and His name is Jesus Christ. :) Glad you enjoyed the post!
Delete