When I think of drudgery, the task that springs to mind is turning flax into linen. Ugh. That has to be the next worst thing to mud wrestling with a hog, though admittedly cleaner and somewhat less smelly. I’ve never done it, mind you, but just the description of what you have to go through to end up with a piece of linen fabric—which then still has to be laboriously hand cut and sewed into a garment—makes me tired. Let’s take a look at what was involved so we can dispel from our minds any romantic ideas about life in previous centuries. I gleaned the following information from Alice Morse Earle’s Home Life in Colonial Days, an invaluable resource for those of us who write about historical times.
![]() |
Flax Field |
![]() |
Ripple |
![]() |
Flax Brakes |

All of these steps had to be done in clear, sunny weather when the flax was dry as tinder. But the preparation still wasn’t done. Now the swingled flax was collected in bundles called strikes. These were swingled again, and the women spun and wove coarse fabric for bags from the refuse, called swingle-tree hurds. The cleaned strikes were sometimes beetled, that is, set into a wooden trough and pounded with a large pestle-shaped “beetle” until it was soft.
Now at last the flax was ready to be hackled or hetcheled. The fineness of the linen depended on how many hacklings the flax received, the fineness of the hackles (combs) used, and the skill of the hackler. The hackler dampened the flax and, holding the bunch at one end, drew it through the hackle teeth toward her. With one stroke the fibers had to be divided into fine filaments, the long threads laid in an untangled line, and the short fibers, or tow, separated and removed. The first hackle was called a ruffler, and the flax was then pulled through as many as 6 more hackles, each finer than the last. Finally the fibers were sorted by fineness, called spreading and drawing.
![]() |
Hackling Flax |
The fibers were now finally ready for the small spinning wheel. They were wrapped around the spindle and the spinner used the foot treadle to spin the fibers into a long, even thread. A small bone, wood, or earthenware cup or a gourd shell filled with water hung on the wheel so the spinner could moisten her fingers as she held the twisting flax while it wound onto the bobbins. When all of these were filled, the thread was wound off in knots and skeins on a reel. There were usually forty strands in a knot, and a clock reel counted the number of strands, clacking when it was full. Twenty knots made a skein or slipping. Two skeins of linen thread was a good day’s work, with a spinster being paid 8 cents a day and her keep.
![]() |
Treadle Spinning Wheel |
All this was just to get to the point where the thread could finally be woven into fabric on a loom. Whew! Hemp was also grown and processed in much the same way. Wool was not quite as labor intensive, but still needed a lot of processing. Obviously keeping one’s family clothed, sheets on the beds, and linens on the table was an ordeal, to say the least. Whenever you get a hankering for the good old days, keep this firmly in mind!
Earle quotes one of her sources, who wrote: “Few have ever seen a woman hatchel flax or card tow, or heard the buzzing of the foot-wheel, or seen bunches of flaxen yarn hanging in the kitchen, or linen cloth whitening on the grass. The flax-dresser with the shives, fibres, and dirt of flax covering his garments, and his face begrimed with flax-dirt has disappeared; the noise of his brake and swingling knife has ended, and the boys no longer make bonfires of his swingling tow. The sound of the spinning-wheel, the song of the spinster, and the snapping of the clock-reel all have ceased; the warping bars and quill wheel are gone, and the thwack of the loom is heard only in the factory. The spinning woman of King Lemuel cannot be found.”
All I have to say to that is praise God!!
I’ve watched spinsters and weavers at reenactments and marveled at their skill. Since we can just go to the store to clothe ourselves and our families, it can be enjoyable to try our hand at some of these crafts to get a feel for life in previous centuries. Have you ever done any spinning or used a loom, or are you an expert? Have you ever wanted to learn how to do these crafts or others from the “olden days”? Please leave a comment and share your experiences and thoughts with us!
~~~
The daughter of Mennonite farmers, J. M. Hochstetler is an author, editor, publisher, and a lifelong student of history. Northkill, Book 1 of the Northkill Amish Series, won Foreword Magazine’s 2014 Indie Book of the Year Bronze Award for historical fiction. Book 2, The Return, released in April. Her American Patriot Series is the only comprehensive historical fiction series on the American Revolution. One Holy Night, a contemporary retelling of the Christmas story, was the Christian Small Publishers 2009 Book of the Year.
After reading this post, I'm tired and so appreciate the ease of obtaining fabric to sew today. I'm seen spinsters and weavers at reenactments but never tried it. Our family has a friend who has a loom and creates beautiful placemats, rugs, etc.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this informative post.
Marilyn, I'm with you. lol! It makes me tired just to think about it. I also love to watch reenactors spinning and weaving linen and wool, but I think I'll just go to the store....
DeleteI agree with Marilyn--just reading all they had to do makes me tired. What a big job! All for a piece of fabric. It's no wonder many folks in the past only had two sets of clothing. Fascinating post!
ReplyDeleteThat's exactly right, Vickie. Two sets of clothing represented a ton of labor at that time. We don't realize how blessed we are today!
DeleteWOW, very interesting! :-)
ReplyDeleteInteresting for sure, Melissa. What a job!
DeleteWow! So glad we don't have to go through all that just to make a dress! Besides that there is no place to do any of that here as you well kn ow, Joan! The flax plant looks pretty. I'd would like to see some of that. Wouldn't mind watching the process either.
ReplyDeleteBeverly, I agree totally. Lol! And I think the flowers are very pretty too. I wouldn't mind having some in my garden, but I'd skip all that work for sure. But like you, I love to watch reenactors do this kind of thing.
DeleteIt would be fun to have the flowers without the work! It seems through the ages with inventions and all people don't know what our ancestors went through on a daily basis just to survive the one day.
DeleteThat's absolutely true, Bev!
DeleteThe process amazes me ... who ever thought to try it? How did they develop the process? Sometimes I think angels must have been sent to tell someone how. Fascinating ... and it makes me really appreciate the linen I wear. I'm thankful I didn't have to produce the yardage!
ReplyDeleteThat's what I always wonder, too, Stephanie. How in the world did they figure all that out. I suspect you're right in that the knowledge was given to a great extent rather than developed over a long period of time. When it takes so much time and labor to get to the product, why would you continue trying to figure it out if you had no idea what you were going to end up with--if anything! lol!
DeleteThose flax plants are sure pretty. It's amazing what those people could do. Their days were very full of work just to keep up with the everyday jobs! Thanks for the history lesson, again!
ReplyDeletePaula, I grew up on a farm in the 1950s and 60s, raised Mennonite, but in researching the colonial period I've concluded that even we didn't know what real work was. I don't think I would have survived it. Lol!
ReplyDelete