I’m working on a few new ideas for stories, and in the course of trying to plot one of them, I found I needed to research how people became lawyers in the Old West.
We all know how you’d study law today. One would
apply for law school, complete the required coursework, take a bar exam, and voila!—you’re a lawyer. But the process
was much different in the past.
During the colonial days, there were no law
schools, either here in America or back in England. In fact, it wasn’t until a
few years after the American Revolution that the first colleges—the College of
William and Mary and the University of Pennsylvania—added a “Chair in Law” to
their collegiate staff. By 1784, the Litchfield Law School opened, becoming the
first official law school. It wasn’t until the 1840s and beyond that Yale, Harvard,
and other prestigious institutions known today opened the doors to their law
schools. And if you were a woman hoping to practice law, your choices were even
fewer. Women were not allowed to study law in colleges and universities until
the late 1800s or early 1900s.
So how did one become a lawyer with few choices
for schooling? The short answer is—you became an apprentice. Sounds simple
enough, though in my estimation, the process was anything but...
The process, called “reading law,” was composed of
only two steps. First, the would-be lawyer would need to find an experienced,
practicing lawyer who was willing to apprentice or mentor him. Second, under
the tutelage of a willing teacher, the new apprentice would begin a period of
study. There was no determined length of this period of study, so I’m led to
believe the length of study depended on the how quickly the student learned and
could convince his teacher he understood the ins and outs of the law.
Title page of Coke's The Institutes of Lawes of England |
There were two main texts used in this study time.
The first, The Institutes of Lawes of
England written by Sir Edward Coke, was a series of legal articles first
published between 1628 and 1644. The other, Commentaries
on the Laws of England written by Sir William Blackstone, was a 18th
century publication on the common laws of England published in four volumes. I
imagine that trying to muddle through these extensive tomes on a self-study course
would be difficult, at best, and would probably require many long discussions
between the experienced lawyer and the apprentice. In addition, other
lesser-known texts could be used for clarification and support, and lectures by
the “Chair of Law” professors at various colleges and universities were also
used to bolster the apprentice’s understanding, if he were near enough to
attend such events. For those living in out of the way places, they relied
strictly on the two resources named above.
Title Page of Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England |
As the study progressed and the apprentice grew in
knowledge, the mentoring lawyer would allow him to do more of the work of a full-fledged
lawyer, whether that was researching laws, filing petitions, or helping to
prepare for trials.
In 1878, the American Bar Association was formed.
Due to the association’s pressure upon the states not to admit just anyone to
the Bar, the method of apprenticeship began to wane. By the 1890s, the new
standard was to attend at least a couple of years of law school before one
could be admitted to the bar.
A few historical figures who became lawyers via
the process of “reading law” were:
Andrew Jackson |
Andrew Jackson—7th President of the
United States
Abraham Lincoln |
Abraham Lincoln—16th President of the
United States
Calvin Coolidge |
Calvin Coolidge—30th President of the
United States
Robert H Jackson |
Robert H Jackson—US Supreme Court Justice
Strom Thurmond |
Strom Thurmond—US Senator and former Presidential
candidate
Interestingly, while the standard today is for
would-be lawyers to graduate from law school, there are still several states
that allow people to become lawyers by reading law under the tutelage of a
practicing judge or attorney, then taking the bar exam. Among them are
California, Maine, Vermont, Virginia, and New York (though New York requires at
least one year of law school). In 2013, sixty people in the U.S. were admitted to
the Bar Association under this process, as opposed to the 84,000 people who
studied in law schools before being admitted to the Bar.
It’s your turn: Would you employ the services of
an attorney today who had “read law” rather than attended law school?
Jennifer Uhlarik discovered the western genre as a pre-teen, when she
swiped the only “horse” book she found on her older brother’s bookshelf. A new
love was born. Across the next ten years, she devoured Louis L’Amour westerns
and fell in love with the genre. In college at the University of Tampa, she
began penning her own story of the Old West. Armed with a B.A. in writing, she
has won five writing competitions and finaled in two other competitions. In
addition to writing, she has held jobs as a private business owner, a
schoolteacher, a marketing director, and her favorite—a full-time homemaker.
Jennifer is active in American Christian Fiction Writers and lifetime member of
the Florida Writers Association. She lives near Tampa, Florida, with her
husband, teenaged son, and four fur children.
Wow, Jenn, I never knew that about Strom and I live here in SC! Thanks for sharing. Can't wait to stump some other South Carolinians with this trivia.
ReplyDeleteGlad I was able to teach you something new, Debbie Lynne. ;)
DeleteHi, Jenn, I didn't know that some states still allowed people to "read" law. That's very interesting. Would I allow someone like that to represent me? I tend to look at experience as opposed to schooling. If a lawyer has a good reputation and has successfully handled similar cases he or she will be on my case.
ReplyDeleteHi Margaret, I feel much the same as you. Official education isn't everything, and certificates and diplomas don't necessarily mean one is the best qualified for the job. I think I'd be open to hiring a lawyer who'd "read" law, so long as I was confident in that person's skill as a lawyer. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
DeleteGreat post, Jen. It's very interesting that a person can take the bar and not attend law-school beforehand. Though an education is extremely valuable, experience can be the best education. Thanks for sharing your research. I can't wait to read your new story.
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by, Michele. Glad to have you here. I agree with you that experience is often the best teacher. There is just nothing like "on the job training."
DeleteHi Jennifer,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your post. I am writing an historical fiction aobut an 1880's noted southwestern lawyer that is asked to train his nephew. Can you give me other sources and perhaps some trial examples where common and not so common procedures were used?
One not so common procedure you might find looking into similar to this is a Mackenzie companion. You can basially have a companion sit beside you in court and give you advice, tips, support etc. But they cannot speak on your behalf. They also do not need to be licensed by that local jurisdiction.
DeleteThanks for this post Jen. God willing I would love to become a lawyer under this apprenticeship model as I find it more practical, fun and profitable (you can get paid while you learn). Thank you for sharing. I was aware of Abraham Lincoln as one of the prototypical examples. Actually, if you look at Roman history we find that it goes even further than that because at one point lawyers were prevetned from forming a professional association or charging a fee for their services. It was basically all oratory back then and you could "ask a friend" who was a good speaker to speak on your behalf.
ReplyDelete