Sunday, July 23, 2017

Fingerprints and a giveaway




Susan Page Davis here. A lot of my books involve fingerprinting, and I had the exciting opportunity to experience it myself a few days ago. Because it involved a travel permit, it was done through a branch of Homeland Security, and they have the latest technology. No ink, no paper cards to be filed. It’s all electronic nowadays. But how did the collection and comparison of fingerprints start?

Herschel

Way back, earlier than 1000 B.C., fingerprints were used on clay tablets to seal business transactions in ancient Babylon.

The Chinese began using thumbprints on clay seals to “sign” documents in the third century B.C. During the T’ang Dynasty, 610 to 907 A.D., fingerprints were used on official documents.

In the 14th Century A.D., in Persia, many government documents had fingerprint impressions, and a government physician noted that no two fingerprints were exactly the same.

In 1686, an Italian professor of anatomy, Marcello Malpighi, used new technology—a microscope—to study fingerprints. He noted the common details of spirals, loops, and ridges. 

In 1823, a Prussian professor of anatomy, Johannes Purkinje, described nine fingerprint patterns. Still no mention was made of using fingerprints as a method of identification.

Herschel
In 1858, Sir William Herschel, who was the chief magistrate of the British District of Jungipoor, India, began requiring a fingerprint and signature on civil contracts completed there with native Indians. He used this to make the people involved feel more bound to the contract, but over time he made the observation that no two were alike, and he said that fingerprints could be used for personal identification purposes. Herschel collected his own fingerprints over more than fifty years and noted that they did not change.

In 1877, The American Journal of Microscopy and Popular Science reported that microscopist Thomas Taylor, with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, proposed that finger and palm prints left on any object might be used to solve crimes.

Dr. Henry Faulds, a British surgeon supervising a hospital in Tokyo, published an article in a scientific journal in 1880. He discussed using printer’s ink as a method of collecting fingerprints for the purpose of personal identification. He developed a system of classifying them and sent his observations to Charles Darwin. Darwin, who was aging and ill, forwarded Dr. Faulds’s data to his cousin, Sir Francis Galton.

In 1882 fingerprints were first known to be used for identification in America by Gilbert Thompson. An employee of the U.S. Geological Survey in New Mexico, he used his own fingerprints on a document to guard against forgery.

Sir Francis Galton
Author Mark Twain was interested in fingerprinting, and he used it in two of his novel plots. In Life on the Mississippi (1883), a murderer was identified by the use of fingerprints. In his 1884 book, Pudd’nhead Wilson, Twain made it a major part of the plot, and fingerprint evidence was included in a courtroom scene.

Darwin’s cousin, Galton, published the first book on fingerprints in 1892. He was a British anthropologist, and he discussed in his book the uniqueness of fingerprints and the individual details they contain.

The first known collection of criminals’ fingerprints began in 1891 in Argentina, initiated by Juan Vucetich, a police official. The first known case in which a fingerprint was used in the solution took place in 1892.

In 1896, the International Association of Chiefs of Police established the National Bureau of Criminal Identification. Its purpose was exchanging arrest information between agencies.

In 1901, back to India: Sir Edward Henry, an inspector general of police in Bengal, developed the first system of classifying fingerprints. It was adopted as the official system in England and eventually spread over the world. He was later the Home Office Secretary and published “The Classification and Use of Fingerprints.” The Fingerprint Branch of New Scotland Yard was established, using Henry’s system.

In 1902, a Paris murder case was solved when police took a fingerprint from the crime scene and matched it to one already on file, belonging to a criminal previously arrested. In America at this time, the systematic use of fingerprints was beginning. In 1905, the U.S. Army began taking members’ fingerprints, and the Navy and Marine Corps began doing so within three years.


In 1910, Frederick Brayley published the first American textbook on fingerprints, "Arrangement of Finger Prints, Identification, and Their Uses."

Fingerprints were first accepted by United States courts as a reliable means of identification in 1911. Thomas Jennings was the first person to be convicted of murder in the U.S. based on fingerprint evidence.

Also in 1911, the first central storage place for fingerprints in North America was established in Ottawa, Canada, maintained by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

In 1924, Congress established the Identification Division of the F.B.I. By 1946, the F.B.I.’s fingerprint repository had more than 100 million fingerprint cards.


Fingerprint card of Rosa Parks. Courtesy of National Archives and Records Administration.
The first computer database of fingerprints was developed in 1980. It came to be known as the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS). Today there are nearly 70 million records (about 700 million individual fingerprints) entered in the AFIS system. Computers can search millions of records in this system in minutes.

In 1996, fingerprinting of children became common in America as a guard against abduction. Parents were given the record card or a home fingerprint kit, maintaining their privacy unless the record was needed. More than 5 million Child ID Fingerprinting Kits had been distributed around the world by 2001.



In 1999, the F.B.I. phased out the use of cards and now uses the integrated AFIS system, based in Clarksburg, W.V., which contains computerized records for approximately 33 million criminals. Older paper cards are still maintained at another facility.

These are just a few of the significant events in the history of fingerprinting. The detectives in my Maine Justice series use fingerprints as one of many tools in solving their cases. If you would like to be entered in a drawing for your choice of books in this series, leave a comment below, including your contact information.

Susan Page Davis is the author of more than seventy novels and novellas in the mystery, romantic suspense, and historical romance genres. A Maine native, she now lives in western Kentucky. She is a winner of the Carol Award, Inspirational Readers’ Choice Award, Will Rogers Medallion, and more. Visit her website at www.susanpagedavis.com, where you can see all her books, sign up for her occasional newsletter, enter a month book drawing, and read a short story on her Romance page.





23 comments:

  1. Susan, what a wonderful and informative post! I completely enjoyed it, thank you! I'm surprised how early in history that fingerprints were used for some means identification. Again, great post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're welcome, Michele! I've enjoyed studying this.

      Delete
  2. Susan, what a great post! I learn so much every time I visit here. Thank you so much! mauback55 at gmail dot com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Melanie. I think every writer on this blog is constantly researching and learning, and we love being able to pass on what we learn.

      Delete
  3. It's amazing that the history of fingerprinting goes back so far. I've never really thought about the history of finger printing before. Thanks for the fabulous info!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, it's a good thing I didn't give a quiz, huh? Love you, Vickie!

      Delete
  4. Isn't history great? That's a fantastic post, Sue.....very informative! I'm loving your new series, and as usual, part of the reason is because of your meticulous and researched attention to detail. Bring on the detectives! Beanfiddle33 at gmail dot com.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I didn't know that fingerprinting was an ancient practice. I love this blog. It's so informative!!! Thanks, Susan. And by the way, for others reading this post, Susan's Justice series is EXCELLENT!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Informative post filled with history of fingerprinting. It's amazing how a fingerprint can provide the evidence needed in an investigation. Thank you for sharing this great post, Susan. marilynridgway78 [at]gmail [dot[com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're welcome, Marilyn. There was way too much information to include, but maybe in a later post.

      Delete
  7. Thank you for the history of fingerprinting. It was quite interesting. The only time I was fingerprinted was when I first got my driver's license in California. They always took our thumbprint. It was messy back then too.

    Blessings,
    Cindy W.
    countrybear52 AT yahoo DOT com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes, and they used to do babies' footprints. Not sure if they still do that.

      Delete
  8. wow this is a really interesting post. thanks for sharing.
    quilting dash lady at Comcast dot net

    ReplyDelete
  9. Susan, thank you for this fascinating post! I was fingerprinted when I renewed my driver's license.
    psalm103and138 at gmail dot com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess it's becoming more common, Caryl. Not sure if I like that or not, but it was an interesting experience.

      Delete
  10. When each of our 4 kids were a week old we inked one foot and a hand and pressed them onto a page of their baby books. We did it for genealogy more than identification, but now I'm wondering what the difference would be if we did it now that they are adults. Could be a fun project for a family reunion. :)

    Thanks for the great info. I love watching Murdoch Mysteries/The Artful Detective and assumed fingerprinting was discovered in the late 19th century. Fascinating topic.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This is such an interesting post! I used one of those kids fingerprinting kits for my younger two children. Is it still the case that no two people have the same prints? I had heard somewhere recently that it had changed but I didn't know if that was correct.

    Thanks for the giveaway too!

    ReplyDelete
  12. So far as I know, no two are exactly alike, not even identical twins. I'll have to do some more reading, Loraine. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Winner of the drawing on this post is Nancy Bean. Congratulations, Nancy! Thank you, everyone who took part.

    ReplyDelete