Dr. Mary E Walker wearing her Medal of Honor |
Last month, I
shared with you about the interesting woman, Dr. Mary E. Walker, who is the
only woman to receive the U.S. Military’s highest award—the Medal of Honor.
Well, there were other interesting details about her that I didn’t share, and I
thought it would make another great post for this month.
Aside from being
a female doctor at a time when such professions tended to be ruled by men, Dr.
Mary Walker was also an abolitionist and a fighter for women’s rights. She
fought for women’s suffrage, equal rights for women in divorce situations, the ability
for women to keep their maiden names after marriage—and for women’s fashion
reforms.
Many of us today
tend to look at the Victorian era fashions with a bit of whimsy or romance. We
see the big skirts, the bustles, the fancy dresses and think they were lovely styles.
But for the women of that day, it was quite an ordeal to get dressed. To give
you an idea of the layers a woman in the Victorian age would wear, here’s a
rundown:
Stockings and
Drawers
The “drawers”
were a lightweight pair of pants, usually with a drawstring waist or sometimes
a button closure and split down the middle “for convenience.”
Chemise
A lightweight, shapeless
garment that hung from the shoulders. It had a drawstring neck and was usually
sleeveless.
Corset
Many of us are
familiar with the corset—the whale-boned garment that gave Victorian women (and
some fashion-conscious men) their wasp-waisted shapes. These garments featured
a busk closure at the front and were laced tightly at the back.
Corset Cover
A light
over-garment meant to protect the corset from dirt, sweat, body oils, etc.
Under Petticoats
This is a very
plain underskirt made of stiffened material. It had a drawstring at the waist
and was meant to provide the fullness they desired under their outer dress.
Women would wear up to six of these under petticoats unless they were wearing a…
Victorian
Crinoline/Hoop Skirt
If a woman was
wearing one of these—a stiff, cage-type contraption that created the very full
silhouette found in Antebellum or Victorian era fashions—then only one under
petticoat was needed.
Over Petticoat
The final
undergarment layer, this petticoat would fit over the hoop or crinoline. The
over petticoat was a more decorative skirt, often with elaborate embroidered
hem.
Dress
Finally, we
reach the lovely dress, which consisted of a jacket-style top, which buttoned
down the front and a very full skirt to fit over the mounds of petticoats on
the bottom half.
Bonnet and
Gloves
The final piece
to the ensemble was the mandatory bonnet and gloves, worn anytime a Victorian
woman was out in public.
So with this
snapshot of the typical nine layers of clothing a Victorian woman would wear,
now think about trying to work in such an ensemble. The weight alone would be
prohibitive, particularly when you consider most of the burden is tied around
the waist. Another factor keeping women from working freely on household chores
or other such things would be the constriction of the corset on the upper body.
Corsets were often laced so tightly, women broke ribs, their internal organs
shifted position, digestion was impeded, and they even made becoming “in the
family way” more difficult. A third prohibition to such attire was the fact
that the many layers of clothing dragged the ground, trapping dust and dirt,
and as was discovered by Louis Pasteur in the 1860s, germs. All these things—as
well as the fact that the skirt silhouette was so large that women often caught
their clothes on fire when tending fires or cooking.
The Bloomer Dress |
So there were
many reasons that Dr. Mary Walker and others began fighting to change the
fashions of their age through the National Dress Reform Association. A friend
and fellow activist—Amelia Jenks Bloomer—created an interesting, if
controversial, ensemble for women to wear. It paired a knee-length skirt with a
pair of Middle-Eastern-style trousers (or bloomers) underneath. Some women
chose to wear the rather startling style, but they were often decried in
newspapers, bullied in the streets, and thought to have lost the allure by most
in the court of public opinion.
Dr. Mary E Walker wearing male-styled attire. |
Mary’s efforts had little effect on the overall fashion of the day, though some women did give up wearing corsets or opted for pants with a shorter skirt over them for better freedom of movement while working. But you can certainly see that Dr. Mary Edwards Walker was a woman born too early—and she was born with enough gumption to fight the mores and standards of a very prim and proper time.
Dr. Mary Walker in a bloomer dress |
It’s your turn: Were you aware of how cumbersome Victorian women’s fashions were, and if you’d lived in that day, would you have gone with the bulk of society to wear those fashions, or would you have come down on the side of the fashion rebels and reformers?
Jennifer Uhlarik discovered the western genre as a pre-teen, when she
swiped the only “horse” book she found on her older brother’s bookshelf. A new
love was born. Across the next ten years, she devoured Louis L’Amour westerns
and fell in love with the genre. In college at the University of Tampa, she
began penning her own story of the Old West. Armed with a B.A. in writing, she
has won and finaled in numerous writing competitions. In addition to writing,
she has held jobs as a private business owner, a schoolteacher, a marketing
director, and her favorite—a full-time homemaker. She currently writes
historical novellas of the American West for Barbour Publishing and works as a
Content Editor for Firefly Southern Fiction. Jennifer is active in American
Christian Fiction Writers and lifetime member of the Florida Writers
Association. She lives near Tampa, Florida, with her husband, college-aged son,
and four fur children.
AVAILABLE NOW!
The Secret Admirers Romance Collection
I'm not a trendsetter, so I probably would have gone with the fashion of the day out of the house, but I imagine I might have worn simpler things at home. Thank God we are now free to wear (for the most part) what we want, although it's sometimes embarassing to those who have to look at what is chosen for outerwear!!!
ReplyDeleteHi Connie, thanks so much for your thoughts. I am probably with you. I'd have worn the "norm"--though I have been known to wear some off-the-wall styles from time to time.
DeleteI may have cut down on the undergarments. I am not sure. Our son and daughter in law had a civil war themed wedding. The are civil war reenactors. Our son made the outfits for himself and all the men standing up with him including his father and father in law. Kristen made her dress and all the dresses for her ladies standing up with her and her moms. She also made all the undergarments for all the ladies plus myself. I made my own dress. And even though it was a lot of material and such. It was very comfortable. I found myself standing taller. Sitting and going to the bathroom were no problem at all. And I really felt feminine.
ReplyDeletequilting dash lady at Comcast dot net
Hi Lori, my brother is a longtime Civil War reenactor, so I'm quite familiar with them. And as one who has done a fair bit of sewing in my day, I've eyed costume patterns for the Civil War era clothes, including undergarments and petticoats, etc. Interesting to hear that they were as comfortable as you found them! Thanks for sharing.
DeleteI would have probably gone with the style of the day.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your thoughts, Melanie!
DeleteI wouldn't have rebelled ... but I would have been someone's maid and their garments weren't as fussy, so I would have had a chance to be a little more comfortable. Dr. Walker was definitely a woman ahead of her time!
ReplyDeleteYou are so right, Stephanie--Dr. Walker was ahead of her time. Thank you for your thoughts!
Delete